According to @timnitGebru, she criticized Effective Altruism figure William MacAskill in a Jan 9, 2026 X post, framing the discussion in the aftermath of Sam Bankman-Fried and referencing prior controversies within the EA community, source: @timnitGebru on X, Jan 9, 2026. She alleges MacAskill introduced SBF to "Muskrat" to pursue a joint purchase of the platform and cites a $15M castle and articles about sexual harassment and abuse within EA as context, source: @timnitGebru on X, Jan 9, 2026. In the linked thread, William MacAskill proposes a "viatopia" for a post-superintelligence world emphasizing material abundance, technological progress, coordination to avoid conflict, low catastrophic risk, preserving optionality, cultivating reflection, and structuring deliberation so better ideas win, source: William MacAskill on X, Jan 9, 2026. Neither post includes any crypto asset mentions, price data, or regulatory filings, indicating no direct market-moving disclosure, source: @timnitGebru on X, Jan 9, 2026; William MacAskill on X, Jan 9, 2026. For trading context, the posts publicly reconnect EA leadership, SBF, and AI governance narratives relevant to thematic AI-crypto and governance-token sentiment tracking; traders can monitor social-volume spikes around Effective Altruism, SBF, superintelligence, and viatopia on X to gauge narrative momentum, source: @timnitGebru on X, Jan 9, 2026; William MacAskill on X, Jan 9, 2026.

According to @timnitGebru, effective altruism proponents use unsubstantiated numbers to justify decisions while presenting themselves as rational, highlighting skepticism toward EA-style quantification in AI governance debates. Source: @timnitGebru on Twitter Dec 5, 2025 https://twitter.com/timnitGebru/status/1996768652889411806 The source text provides no quantitative metrics, asset references, or policy updates that would directly affect pricing in equities or crypto, indicating this is a sentiment-oriented input rather than a tradeable catalyst. Source: @timnitGebru on Twitter Dec 5, 2025 https://twitter.com/timnitGebru/status/1996768652889411806

According to @timnitGebru, a final message stated 'It's time to start reaccelerating' technology (source: @timnitGebru). According to @timnitGebru, effective altruists asked who should address their constituents and selected that individual to speak (source: @timnitGebru). According to @timnitGebru, the post includes no assets, timelines, or policy specifics, leaving no immediate, quantifiable trading catalyst for AI equities or crypto AI tokens (source: @timnitGebru).

According to @timnitGebru, Emile’s post alleges the Effective Altruism community disregards facts and harasses or threatens critics, framing EA as a dangerous cult, source: @timnitGebru (X, Nov 29, 2025). The source presents no market data, tickers, or cryptocurrency references and includes no quantitative evidence, providing no direct trading signal, source: @timnitGebru (X, Nov 29, 2025). The post offers opinion-led criticism with no cited policy moves, corporate statements, or regulatory actions that would constitute an immediate market catalyst, source: @timnitGebru (X, Nov 29, 2025).

According to @timnitGebru, her posts that reference effective altruists consistently attract comments framed with a veneer of rational objectivity and tend to appear on threads widely shared within that community. Source: @timnitGebru on X, Nov 17, 2025. The post focuses on discourse patterns and includes no references to cryptocurrencies, tokens, prices, regulations, or trading signals, indicating no immediate market catalyst. Source: @timnitGebru on X, Nov 17, 2025.

According to Timnit Gebru, the Effective Altruism community uses an appearance of rationality to discredit critics by implying they are insane or deceptive while claiming objectivity, signaling negative sentiment toward EA rhetoric in AI governance discourse, source: Timnit Gebru, X, Nov 17, 2025. According to Timnit Gebru, this public post provides a real-time negative sentiment datapoint that traders can log when tracking narrative risk around EA-linked discussions in AI policy and safety debates, source: Timnit Gebru, X, Nov 17, 2025.

According to @timnitGebru, replies to their recent post repeatedly used the term ad hominem, signaling engagement from effective altruism commenters (source: @timnitGebru on Twitter). The post provides no details on AI models, funding, regulation, or crypto assets, offering no market-moving disclosures for traders (source: @timnitGebru on Twitter).

According to @timnitGebru, an effective altruist identified a typo in Karen’s seminal book involving incorrect units for a number that was published without units, highlighting criticism of effective altruism’s OpenAI-and-AGI narrative, source: @timnitGebru. No trading metrics, price data, tickers, or crypto references were provided in the post, so this update is narrative-only with no quantifiable market signal, source: @timnitGebru.